Cadden & Fuller LLP

Contact Our Irvine Office 888-988-3477

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Cadden & Fuller LLP
888-988-3477
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

A Client-Focused Approach to Business and Real Estate Law

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Commercial Real Estate
  4.  » 
  5. What are passive real estate investments?

What are passive real estate investments?

On Behalf of Cadden & Fuller LLP | Nov 15, 2021 | Commercial Real Estate, Real Estate |

While investing in commercial real estate, such as multifamily properties, is a great way to enhance your portfolio, not everyone has the capital to invest in truly lucrative properties. Fortunately, there are investment opportunities that require a lower maintenance commitment.

Kiplinger provides insight into two passive real estate investment strategies that prove quite profitable in certain situations. By understanding how these strategies work, you can make an informed decision when investing.

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs)

DSTs are very similar to trusts used for estate planning purposes. Up to 499 individuals can invest in DST properties, which usually include very large multifamily properties or industrial buildings. Because they own an undivided fractional interest in commercial properties, investors are also owners of said properties. However, trustees are responsible for managing properties and making important decisions regarding them. Investors must usually make a minimum investment of $100,000 for inclusion in DSTs.

Tenants-in-common (TIC)

A TIC is another co-investment strategy that functions similarly to DSTs. Because TICs has a lower investor limit of 35 individuals, investments are typically much higher than with DSTs. For example, each investor may need to provide between $250,000 and $1 million for inclusion in a TIC.

They are often less passive when compared to DSTs, but TICs have an added benefit of a cash-out refinance after a few years have elapsed. That means investors can retain some of their equity and re-invest it into other properties.

Both DSTs and TICs allow investors to take part in a “like-kind” exchange, also known as a 1031 exchange. These transactions allow you to defer taxes by reinvesting equity after a sale into a similar property. Taxes only apply once a sale occurs and equity is not re-invested.

Categories

  • Business Litigation (69)
  • Business Transactions (43)
  • Commercial Real Estate (63)
  • Real Estate (24)

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Steps to take if you suspect a breach of fiduciary duty
  • Can a property owner sell a leased property during its term?
  • California securities litigation and when it may be needed
  • What to look for in a potential business merger
  • Key considerations for California mergers

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys Today

Cadden & Fuller LLP
Brand
Cadden & Fuller LLP

2050 Main Street
Suite 260
Irvine, CA 92614

Irvine Office

Phone: 888-988-3477

Fax: 949-450-0650

Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Cadden & Fuller LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw