Cadden & Fuller LLP

Contact Our Irvine Office 888-988-3477

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Cadden & Fuller LLP
888-988-3477
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

A Client-Focused Approach to Business and Real Estate Law

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Business Litigation
  4.  » 
  5. How California’s antitrust laws are utilized

How California’s antitrust laws are utilized

On Behalf of Cadden & Fuller LLP | Apr 13, 2020 | Business Litigation |

Antitrust laws are focused on removing unfair restraints from trade and commerce. Antitrust laws, whose foundation lies in the Sherman Act and Clayton Act, may be enforced in two ways:

  • The state attorney general can sue on the state’s behalf to end an unfair practice through a prohibitive injunction or by administering punishment via fines and consumer compensation.
  • Consumers or competing businesses can file a private ‘right of action’ in which they use a lawsuit to recover damages.

A recent case study

This past winter, Sutter Health agreed to pay a $575 million settlement in its antitrust case. The California Attorney General filed a case against Sutter Health, a large nonprofit health care system totaling 24 hospitals and 34 surgery centers in Northern California. The case came after a group of employers claimed Sutter Health had driven up market prices using its vast dominance in the region. Recently, the S&P Global Ratings downgraded Sutter Health’s bond ratings due to the combination of the settlement and the impact of COVID-19 raising doubts amongst investors.

The terms of the agreement

Sutter Health agreed to cease a series of actions that the Attorney General alleged unfairly squashed competition. One of these practices included ‘all-or-nothing’ contract arrangements that insisted insurers had to include all of Sutter Health’s hospitals if it wanted contracts with any one of them. The health care system will continue operating as a single system while it enacts these changes. The settlement included oversight by a ‘special monitor’ to ensure the entity complies with the terms of the agreement for a minimum of ten years.

Improving free trade and commerce

Settlements like the one against Sutter Health, according to California’s Attorney General Xavier Becerra, are integral to ‘restoring competition’ in economic markets. If your company is considering a lawsuit against a company using unfair competition tactics, contact a lawyer with experience in commercial business litigation.

Categories

  • Business Litigation (69)
  • Business Transactions (43)
  • Commercial Real Estate (63)
  • Real Estate (24)

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Steps to take if you suspect a breach of fiduciary duty
  • Can a property owner sell a leased property during its term?
  • California securities litigation and when it may be needed
  • What to look for in a potential business merger
  • Key considerations for California mergers

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys Today

Cadden & Fuller LLP
Brand
Cadden & Fuller LLP

2050 Main Street
Suite 260
Irvine, CA 92614

Irvine Office

Phone: 888-988-3477

Fax: 949-450-0650

Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Cadden & Fuller LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw