Cadden & Fuller LLP

Contact Our Irvine Office 888-988-3477

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Cadden & Fuller LLP
888-988-3477
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

A Client-Focused Approach to Business and Real Estate Law

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Commercial Real Estate
  4.  » 
  5. Business liabilities with foreclosures in California

Business liabilities with foreclosures in California

On Behalf of Cadden & Fuller LLP | Apr 21, 2020 | Commercial Real Estate |

There are heightened risks for lenders in California who need to act against a borrower who owes payments to them. This risk comes from the California statute known as the one-action rule (also known as the single-action rule). California community associations can bring lawsuits against owners in foreclosure territory, but they need to choose a limited outcome: a judgment or foreclosure.

Understanding California’s one-action rule for owners

A borrower can use the one-action rule in the defense against an association pursuing a non-judicial foreclosure. The rule is meant to protect a property owner who owes mortgage payments or other payments on secured loans from being confronted with an overwhelming variety of actions filed by the lender. When a California community association uses a lien to secure a delinquent owner’s obligation, the statute prohibits that association from suing the owner after enacting a non-judicial foreclosure.

The nuances in the law

For lenders attempting to recover debts or enforce a right secured by a mortgage on California real property, the law presents many severe penalties for improper procedures. If the lender doesn’t comply with the rule, it could risk forfeiture of its liens on real properties. The One-Action Rule produces the following restrictions to lenders attempting to collect a debt for the following scenarios:

  • If the judicial foreclosure was limited to a specific portion of the real property that secured the debt
  • If the lender attempts to recover a monetary judgment on a debt simultaneously with the foreclosure
  • A creditor must complete foreclosure proceedings and exhaust their real property security before they can obtain a judgment on the debt.

Preventing the consequences of a one-action rule violation

The outcome of violating the one-action rule can mean a devastating impact on an entity’s rights to collateral, even if the violation is inadvertent. For out-of-state lenders and international entities, the limitations associated with financing projects and ventures in California may be less familiar and can result in unintended risks. A lawyer with experience in commercial business litigation and commercial real estate law can guide you through this process and the restrictions to lenders specific to the state of California.

Categories

  • Business Litigation (69)
  • Business Transactions (43)
  • Commercial Real Estate (63)
  • Real Estate (24)

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Steps to take if you suspect a breach of fiduciary duty
  • Can a property owner sell a leased property during its term?
  • California securities litigation and when it may be needed
  • What to look for in a potential business merger
  • Key considerations for California mergers

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys Today

Cadden & Fuller LLP
Brand
Cadden & Fuller LLP

2050 Main Street
Suite 260
Irvine, CA 92614

Irvine Office

Phone: 888-988-3477

Fax: 949-450-0650

Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Cadden & Fuller LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw