Cadden & Fuller LLP

Contact Our Irvine Office 888-988-3477

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Cadden & Fuller LLP
888-988-3477
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

A Client-Focused Approach to Business and Real Estate Law

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Commercial Real Estate
  4.  » 
  5. Recently proposed law could impact commercial real estate rentals

Recently proposed law could impact commercial real estate rentals

On Behalf of Cadden & Fuller LLP | Jun 3, 2020 | Commercial Real Estate |

The current health situation in California and across the nation has roiled many industries. The commercial real estate market is one and it has planted the seeds for many potential problems for owners and tenants. Since owners make their profits through renting out their properties to commercial entities, anything that interferes with the course of business can be problematic financially and personally. In short, if the business is unable to operate and earn sufficient income to pay the bills, the owner will not receive the rent.

For owners who are concerned about this issue, understanding potential changes to current law and how it may impact their situation is critical. A bill has been proposed in California that will let commercial tenants terminate a lease if the current landscape is not adequately addressed based on a resolution designed to assist renters. Since so many people have been forced to shutter their businesses through government mandate, paying the rent has been troublesome. The goal is not to allow people to break their lease randomly, but to encourage the sides to come to a reasonable solution without evictions.

At first, the bill stopped commercial evictions while businesses are still required to be closed. As it moved forward, it was revised accordingly. However, a group that specializes in real estate advocacy suggests that landlords can be harmed by this law if it passes. Still, the tenants would be required to pay past-due rent for up to three months. They would also be granted up to one year to pay it. This is for so-called “small” businesses, food and drink establishments, and entertainment businesses. The program is designed to avoid publicly traded companies from using it, so owners are protected in that area as well. Even with that, owners are concerned about how this could be construed as a violation of their rights. Hearings are ongoing.

The current crisis and laws that are being created to address it adds another layer to the complex nature of being a landlord and renting commercial property. For contracts, leases, the need to foreclose and evict tenants and any other challenge that arises, having legal assistance is one of the most important decisions a commercial real estate company can make. A law firm with experience in real estate and protecting an owner’s interests can be crucial. Calling for a consultation may provide advice, guidance and representation to handle a case.

Categories

  • Business Litigation (69)
  • Business Transactions (43)
  • Commercial Real Estate (63)
  • Real Estate (24)

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Steps to take if you suspect a breach of fiduciary duty
  • Can a property owner sell a leased property during its term?
  • California securities litigation and when it may be needed
  • What to look for in a potential business merger
  • Key considerations for California mergers

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys Today

Cadden & Fuller LLP
Brand
Cadden & Fuller LLP

2050 Main Street
Suite 260
Irvine, CA 92614

Irvine Office

Phone: 888-988-3477

Fax: 949-450-0650

Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Cadden & Fuller LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw