Cadden & Fuller LLP

Contact Our Irvine Office 888-988-3477

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Cadden & Fuller LLP
888-988-3477
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

A Client-Focused Approach to Business and Real Estate Law

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Business Transactions
  4.  » 
  5. Force majeure clauses may be a contract escape hatch

Force majeure clauses may be a contract escape hatch

On Behalf of Cadden & Fuller LLP | May 6, 2020 | Business Transactions |

Anticipating business contingencies is a prudent part of business planning and contract drafting. But business must also confront unexpected and unavoidable events. To deal with these, force majeure clauses are an important part of commercial business transactions.

Force majeure is a French term which is translated as superior force. It is also a common legal term that identifies a contract clause where a party does not have to comply with the terms of a contract. Compliance may be excused if unavoidable or unpredictable events affect a party’s ability to perform their contractual duties.

Force majeure contract clauses usually contain a specific list of events that allow a party to withdraw from the deal without penalty. These include severe weather, flood, earthquake, fire, epidemics and other Acts of God. Other typical events are act of war or terrorism, strikes or labor disputes, acts of government authorities, inability to obtain materials and other events beyond a party’s reasonable control.

Most business-to-business contracts contain these clauses. Commercial leases and development projects also have been using these. But force majeure clauses are not usually in personal mortgages, apartment leases and home improvement contracts.

This clause may be invoked if a force majeure event prevents a party from meeting the terms of the contract. But a party is usually not excused if it could and should have prepared for the terrible event or disaster. Bankruptcy or other economic reasons are also invalid reasons for being excused.

These clauses also change over time. After 9/11, for example, terrorism was included as force majeure event. Future contracts may have clauses that include a word like pandemic.

An attorney can help draft contracts and provide advice on transactions that meet a party’s needs and anticipates events. They can also assist parties when sudden and unanticipated events occur.

Categories

  • Business Litigation (69)
  • Business Transactions (43)
  • Commercial Real Estate (63)
  • Real Estate (24)

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Steps to take if you suspect a breach of fiduciary duty
  • Can a property owner sell a leased property during its term?
  • California securities litigation and when it may be needed
  • What to look for in a potential business merger
  • Key considerations for California mergers

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys Today

Cadden & Fuller LLP
Brand
Cadden & Fuller LLP

2050 Main Street
Suite 260
Irvine, CA 92614

Irvine Office

Phone: 888-988-3477

Fax: 949-450-0650

Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Cadden & Fuller LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw