Cadden & Fuller LLP

Contact Our Irvine Office 888-988-3477

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Cadden & Fuller LLP
888-988-3477
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Thomas H. Cadden
    • H. Daniel Fuller
    • William D. Chapman
    • Judy Hirahara
    • Cecilia A. Perkins
    • John B. Taylor
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Litigation
      • Breach Of Contract
      • Breach Of Fiduciary Duty
      • Creditor Remedies
      • Directors And Officers’ Litigation
      • Fraud
      • Investment / Securities Litigation
      • Unfair Business Practices
      • Unfair Competition
    • Partnership And Shareholder Disputes
      • Partnership Disputes And Litigation
      • Shareholder Disputes And Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
      • Breach Of Lease Disputes And Litigation
      • Purchase And Sale Litigation
      • Zoning Disputes
      • Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
      • FAQ About Easements
    • Landlord-Tenant And Commercial Lease Disputes
    • Proposition 65 Litigation
    • Insurance Disputes
      • Insurance Companies’ Refusal To Defend
      • Insurance Companies’ Failure To Indemnify
      • Bad Faith Claims
    • Employment Defense Litigation
    • Transactional Law
      • Business And Corporate Transactions
      • Real Estate Transactions
      • Labor Transactions
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

A Client-Focused Approach to Business and Real Estate Law

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Commercial Real Estate
  4.  » 
  5. Questions to ask before suing a defaulting tenant

Questions to ask before suing a defaulting tenant

On Behalf of Cadden & Fuller LLP | Mar 13, 2020 | Commercial Real Estate |

The first instinct of any commercial real estate landlord may be to sue a tenant defaulting on rent. However, the American Bar Association warns that litigation may not always be the preferable option. 

Here are some circumstances that may affect the profitability of taking a defaulting tenant to court. 

Is the tenant solvent? 

If the company that occupied the space has gone under, it may not be able to satisfy a judgment. Winning will not mean much if there is no money. With some research or the assistance of a private investigator, a landlord may find useful information regarding the company’s ownership or lack of assets. 

Does the lease include damages? 

Lost rent is rarely a small matter, but the landlord must weigh that against the potential expense and time of litigating. However, leases often give landlords the right to pursue other damages. These may include: 

  • Late fees and interest 
  • Property taxes and insurance 
  • Utilities 
  • Maintenance and repairs 
  • The expenses of re-leasing the property 

Has the landlord tried to limit the damages? 

A judge will want to know that the landlord has taken reasonable steps to mitigate the damages. Allowing a space to stand vacant is one example that the courts frown on. Reasonability is key, though. A commercial broker may provide expert witness that the landlord took reasonable steps, but that the expense of doing more, such as making extensive modifications, was not feasible. 

Does the lease address attorney fees? 

The cost of going to court becomes much less of a concern if the lease includes a clause that puts responsibility for attorney fees on the tenant. In fact, such a clause combined with responsibility for damages may create a willingness on the part of the tenant to find a way to settle rather than go to court. 

With a good lease, the probability of recovering at least some of the damages improves exponentially. However, a landlord with a defaulting tenant should always weigh the potential benefits of litigation, even in situations that initially seem less than favorable. 

Categories

  • Business Litigation (69)
  • Business Transactions (43)
  • Commercial Real Estate (63)
  • Real Estate (24)

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Steps to take if you suspect a breach of fiduciary duty
  • Can a property owner sell a leased property during its term?
  • California securities litigation and when it may be needed
  • What to look for in a potential business merger
  • Key considerations for California mergers

Subscribe To This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Attorneys Today

Cadden & Fuller LLP
Brand
Cadden & Fuller LLP

2050 Main Street
Suite 260
Irvine, CA 92614

Irvine Office

Phone: 888-988-3477

Fax: 949-450-0650

Review Us
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2026 Cadden & Fuller LLP • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw