- Can corporations avoid consumer class actions?
- Why do appeals courts deal with only legal issues?
- What are the prerequisites to raising a legal issue on appeal?
- Why does changing the description of a debt change a creditor's rights in bankruptcy?
- What is small claims court?
- Do military personnel enjoy the same constitutional protections in a criminal case that civilians do?
- What is a statute of limitations?
- What is an interference hearing and how does it affect patent protection?
- In what ways can the Court of International Trade help domestic industries compete with imports?
- If the Constitution only mentions the Supreme Court, how did all the other federal courts develop?
- Learn More: Litigation and Appeals
What Should I Do if I Get Served With a Subpoena?
This article covers problems that may arise when you are not a party to the lawsuit but are subpoenaed to appear for a deposition or to produce documents in your possession. Your lawyer can file an objection that notifies the party or lawyer serving the subpoena on you that you have a problem with what the subpoena is commanding you to do. The party must then get a court order before you will be required to comply with the subpoena. In certain situations you can also resist a subpoena by filing a motion to quash. A motion to quash asks the court in charge of the lawsuit to rule that, for some particular reason, the subpoena need not be complied with as it is currently written. A motion to quash is sometimes mistakenly referred to as a motion to squash. This name is a mistake in words but not in spirit, as "squashing" the subpoena is exactly what you'd be asking the court to do.
The following proposed solutions are based on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If the lawsuit is being litigated in state court, the rules may be different and you should check the court's rules about third-party subpoenas. Many states follow rules very similar to the federal rules. Other states follow their own path.
1. Legal Representation
Problem: The lawyers representing the parties to the lawsuit do not represent you. That means that although they may answer questions you have about the subpoena, they do not have a duty to provide legal advice, and you should not rely on either lawyer for advice about responding to or resisting the subpoena, or for assistance in responding or resisting. But if, for example, you're being asked to testify about the defendant's trade secrets or to produce confidential information about the plaintiff, they may make their own objections to protect their secrets and confidential information from unnecessary disclosure.
Solution: If you have qualms about producing the requested information, or you don't want to go it alone during a deposition, you should ask a lawyer to represent you. Legal representation is crucial if you cannot comply with the subpoena because, no matter how good your reason is, it does not justify failing to respond to the subpoena; it's a court order even though a lawyer has signed it and sent it to you. Instead, you must ask the court to modify the order or declare that it need not be complied with. If you don't ask the court for assistance, you run the risk of being found in contempt of court.
2. The Subpoena Asks for Documents and Things I Don't Have.
Problem: The party issuing the subpoena has asked you to produce things that you don't have, or as far as you know, don't exist.
Solution: Obviously, you cannot produce something if you don't have it. But if you are in control of the items you are to produce, the fact that they are not physically in your possession will not excuse your failure to produce them. If you don't actually have possession or control over the documents and items being requested, start by contacting the lawyer for the party who has subpoenaed you to let him or her know. If you know who does have the documents and things, consider telling the lawyer. The lawyer probably does not want to plague you. He or she just wants the information. If you can direct the lawyer elsewhere, you might be off the hook.
If the lawyer does not accept that you just don't have the information, you should make a formal objection to the subpoena by notifying the party or his or her lawyer that you object and why. It is best to send a written objection with the date on it. If the case is in federal court, you must do this right away. If fourteen days elapse and you haven't objected, you won't be able to. If you are in state court, the rules may be slightly different, but again, you must not dawdle.
Once you object, the party issuing the subpoena cannot inspect or copy documents without first getting a court order. This is done by filing a motion to compel. If you receive a motion to compel, you will probably want to talk to a lawyer about what to do next.
3. Responding to the Subpoena Would Be a Pain in the Neck.
Problem: To respond to the subpoena you must spend an inordinate amount of time or money to find the documents or the items you're supposed to produce, or you have hundreds of documents, or the like. It strikes you that the party or lawyer is using the subpoena to harass you.
Solution: The legal term for a pain in the neck is "undue burden." The party subpoenaing you has a responsibility to take reasonable steps to avoid imposing an undue burden or expense on you. When it appears that the party is abusing the subpoena process or is harassing you, the court can intercede and sanction the party's lawyer. You ask the court to intercede by filing a motion to quash. If the court agrees with you, the party, or lawyer, may be required to pay your lost earnings and a reasonable attorney fee.
4. The Subpoena Requires Me to Travel Away from Home.
Problem: To comply with the subpoena as it is written, you must travel some distance.
Solution: If the lawsuit is filed in federal district court (you can determine this by looking at the top of the subpoena to see which court issued the subpoena), you cannot be compelled to travel more than 100 miles from your residence, place of employment, or the place where you regularly transact business in person in order to respond to the subpoena. If the subpoena seems to require travel, you can ask the court to quash it. For example, if you live in Anchorage, Alaska, but your business is mostly conducted over the telephone or the Internet, you cannot be commanded to travel to the island of Attu or to Juneau, or to Seattle or any point south or east of there.
If the subpoena commands you to appear to testify at trial, and you would have to travel more than 100 miles to attend the trial at substantial personal expense, you can ask the court to quash or modify it. In this case, the party issuing the subpoena must satisfy the court that you really have to be there and that you will be reasonably compensated for attending trial.
If the lawsuit is filed in state court (again, look at the top of the subpoena to figure out which court issued it), the rules may be different. Many states follow rules that are very similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, so the solutions discussed above may well apply. You should check the court's rules about third-party subpoenas. If you conclude that the subpoena overreaches by making you travel too far, you can ask a lawyer to help you have it quashed.
Copyright © 2008 FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business
DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent counsel for advice on any legal matter.